Skip to content

Online Film Critics Society

The World's Oldest Organization of Online Film Critics

Primary Menu
  • HOME
  • MEMBERS
  • REVIEWS
    • 2025 Reviews
    • 2024 Reviews
    • 2023 Reviews
    • 2022 Reviews
    • 2021 Reviews
    • 2020 Reviews
    • 2019 Reviews
    • 2018 Reviews
    • 2017 Reviews
    • 2016 Reviews
    • 2015 Reviews
    • 2014 Reviews
    • 2013 Reviews
    • 2012 Reviews
    • 2011 Reviews
  • AWARDS
    • 2025 Awards (29th Annual)
    • 2024 Awards (28th Annual)
    • 2023 Awards (27th Annual)
    • 2022 Awards (26th Annual)
    • 2021 Awards (25th Annual)
    • 2020 Awards (24th Annual)
    • 2019 Awards (23rd Annual)
    • 2018 Awards (22nd Annual)
    • 2017 Awards (21st Annual)
    • 2016 Awards (20th Annual)
    • 2015 Awards (19th Annual)
    • 2014 Awards (18th Annual)
    • 2013 Awards (17th Annual)
    • 2012 Awards (16th Annual)
    • 2011 Awards (15th Annual)
    • 2010 Awards (14th Annual)
    • 2009 Awards (13th Annual)
    • 2008 Awards (12th Annual)
    • 2007 Awards (11th Annual)
    • 2006 Awards (10th Annual)
    • 2005 Awards (9th Annual)
    • 2004 Awards (8th Annual)
    • 2003 Awards (7th Annual)
    • 2002 Awards (6th Annual)
    • 2001 Awards (5th Annual)
    • 2000 Awards (4th Annual)
    • 1999 Awards (3rd Annual)
    • 1998 Awards (2nd Annual)
    • 1997 Awards (1st Annual)
  • MORE LINKS
    • This Week
    • Classics & DVD
    • Festival Coverage
    • Video Essays & Reviews
    • Awards Coverage
    • Top Ten Lists
    • Television Reviews
    • Short Film Reviews
    • Other Articles
  • BECOME A MEMBER?
  • CONTACT US
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Bylaws
    • OFCS Awards Rules
    • History
  • Home
  • Member Reviews
  • 2025 Films
  • Reviews: Mickey 17 (2025)
  • 2025 Films

Reviews: Mickey 17 (2025)

Governing Committee March 6, 2025 2 minutes read

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Mickey_17-Header

Here are review links for this film submitted by our members:

  • Rick Aragon @ Rick’s Texan Reviews
    • Excerpt: Mickey 17, the newest film from Parasite director Bong Joon Ho, is a long, boring, rambling, confused film that is delusional in its ideas about itself.
  • Gregory Carlson @ southpawfilmworks.net
  • Laura Clifford @
    • Excerpt: [Bong Joon Ho’s] adaptation of Edward Ashton’s novel ‘Mickey 7’ starts promisingly, Pattinson going into full dimwitted stooge mode as the object of some very black comedy, but once the plot thickens its strands begin to unravel and the film becomes a weak mash-up of “Snowpiercer” crossed with “Okja.”
  • Mark Hobin @ Fast Film Reviews
    • Excerpt: The high point is Robert Pattinson, who delivers two distinct versions of the same person. However, the story descends into a chaos of scattered ideas in the second half.
  • Jared Mobarak @ Hey, have you seen …?
    • Excerpt: [Pattinson is] by far the best part of the film. [His] dual performances showing how different the same person can be when forced to consider the violence committed upon them by outside forces and themselves.
  • Jacob Oller @ The A.V. Club
    • Excerpt: Mickey 17 is an unwieldy, long-winded, wildly entertaining sci-fi critique of our dehumanizing present.
  • Paulo Portugal @ Insider.pt [Portuguese]
    • Excerpt: “They were expendable”, assim reza o título do filme do John Ford, realizado há precisamente 80 anos. Isso mesmo, no ano do fim da 2.ª Guerra Mundial. O que isto tem a ver com Mickey 17? Isso. Rigorosamente nada.
  • [New] | Josh Thayer @ The Forgetful Film Critic
    • Excerpt: If there were any doubts left that Bong Joon Ho is the world’s foremost fantastical chronicler of how class continues to hold the human species back from the best version of itself, Mickey 17 should put them to rest. Like Parasite and Snowpiercer before it, Bong’s wackiest sci-fi adventure to date focuses on people at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder.
  • Sebastian Zavala @ MeGustaElCine.com [Spanish]
    • Excerpt: Through a science fiction premise, the film develops a narrative that combines different styles, genres and tones, and although it is not entirely satisfactory, it still has much to recommend it.

About the Author

Governing Committee

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts

Post navigation

Previous: Film Reviews: Classics & More (Mar. 4, 2025)
Next: Reviews: Cleaner (2025)

Related Stories

Pillion-Header
  • 2025 Films

Reviews: Pillion (2025)

Governing Committee February 26, 2026
Voice_of_Hind_Rajab-Header
  • 2025 Films

Reviews: The Voice of Hind Rajab (2025)

Governing Committee January 29, 2026
Alabama_Solution-Header
  • 2025 Films

Reviews: The Alabama Solution (2025)

Governing Committee January 22, 2026

Upcoming Awards Dates

Screening Deadline:
Dec. 31, 2025
Noms Announced:
Jan. 12, 2026
Winners Announced:
Jan. 26, 2026

Log in

Categories

You may have missed

Hoppers-Weekly
  • This Week at the Movies

This Week at the Movies (Mar. 6, 2026)

Governing Committee March 6, 2026 0
Dreams-Header
  • 2026 Films

Reviews: Dreams (2026)

Governing Committee March 5, 2026
Bride-Header
  • 2026 Films

Reviews: The Bride! (2026)

Governing Committee March 5, 2026
Hoppers-Header
  • 2026 Films

Reviews: Hoppers (2026)

Governing Committee March 5, 2026
Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.